Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Eric Holder, Contempt & Race

Capitol Hill - Washington, DC

Image by VinothChandar via Flickr

Overshadowed by the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Affordable Care Act was a historic action taken by the U.S. House of Representatives. For the first time ever, one of the legislative branch’s two chambers voted to hold a member of a President’s cabinet—Attorney General Eric Holder—in contempt of Congress.

The reasons given by the Republican-controlled Committee on Oversight and Government Reform for holding the Attorney General in contempt are questionable at best – the refusal to supply documents subpoenaed by the committe. The Justice Department has argued, to no avail, that the specific documents requested contain:

  • internal deliberations
  • information involving ongoing investigations

and therefor canNOT be shared with the Committee.  Also, the request for these documents is to hopefully uncover a conspiracy the Committee already has ample evidence that it DOESN’T exist.

There’s a reason that Holder is, next to the President himself, the member of the Obama Administration that the right most loves to hate. It’s not necessarily racism—not stemming, that is, from a belief that Holder is somehow inferior or ill-willed because he’s black—but that doesn’t mean it’s not about race.
Legally speaking, Congress doesn’t really have the power to make the contempt citation more than a statement, or to use it to force Holder’s coöperation. So, the only reason for the contempt vote is to demean the Attorney General and hopefully embarrass and undermine this country’s first African American president.
 
…Read the full article at Holder, Contempt, and Race – New Yorker